Profil von »ManualP35«

Lieber Besucher, herzlich willkommen bei: PKV Foren für alle Private Krankenversicherung. Falls dies Ihr erster Besuch auf dieser Seite ist, lesen Sie sich bitte die Hilfe durch. Dort wird Ihnen die Bedienung dieser Seite näher erläutert. Darüber hinaus sollten Sie sich registrieren, um alle Funktionen dieser Seite nutzen zu können. Benutzen Sie das Registrierungsformular, um sich zu registrieren oder informieren Sie sich ausführlich über den Registrierungsvorgang. Falls Sie sich bereits zu einem früheren Zeitpunkt registriert haben, können Sie sich hier anmelden.

ManualP35

Anfänger
- »ManualP35« ist männlich
- Registrieren Sie sich jetzt!
Sie müssen sich registrieren, um eine Verbindung mit diesem Benutzer herzustellen.

Über mich

[url=http://Shop.Silverlungs.com/SearchResults.asp?Cat=1823padding:10px 0px 10px 10px;border:0px;">As most readers of theColloidal Silver Secrets and techniques weblog are conscious, theres now rather a lot occurring behind the scenes on the EPA with reference to the potential regulation of merchandise containing silver nanoparticles -- includingcolloidal silver.

After the debacle final yr during which a handful of radical environmental teams weresoundly trounced of their efforts to power the EPA to drag nanosilver merchandise off the market and start to regulate them as toxic environmental pesticides, the EPA then established aNanosilver Scientific Advisory Panel to additional research the problems raised by the environmentalists, and give you regulatory proposals in keeping with present science.

This new EPA Panel then held a gathering in Arlington, VA on November three-5, 2009 to get the ball rolling. (You possibly can see the transcript of that assembly -- apparently with some omissions --right here.)

Does Nanosilver Meet the factors for Extra Stringent Regulation?

Happily, representatives of the Silver Institutes newly formed Silver Nanotechnology Working Group (SNWG) attended the assembly. And in a presentation given by SNWGs Dr. Murray J. Top, it was accurately emphasised that nanosilver merely doesn't meet the EPAs two fundamental standards for a business product thought to be in want of extra stringent regulation, which is to say, it's not a brand new invention and it doesn't have characteristically distinctive practical attributes.

Certainly, as Dr. Top identified to Panel attendees, nanosilver merchandise have now been registered with federal businesses for over six many years, and have been manufactured for over a hundred years. In actual fact, the primary nanosilver product to be [url=http://shop.silverlungs.com/SearchResults.asp?Cat=1823&Click=12579]federally registered[/url] -- Silver Algaedyn, a product designed to regulate
algae buildup in swimming swimming pools - was registered underneath the FIFRA Act in 1954a full sixteen years earlier than the
official institution of the EPA!

In different phrases, some federally registered business merchandise containing silver nanoparticles really pre-date the institution of EPA itself.

So, opposite to the shrill cries of the radical environmentalists who've labeled nanosilver as a
new invention, and have been pushing EPA to re-categorize nanosilver as an environmental toxin and regulate it
into oblivion, the reality is that nanosilver isn't
new by any stretch of the imagination. It has a protracted historical past of use in registered business
merchandise going again properly over 60 years, with no vital environmental repercussions in any respect in all of that point.
And due to this fact it doesn't meet the primary and most vital standards for the consideration of
extra regulatory oversight.

Whats extra, SNWG representatives identified that
every one registered merchandise containing silver nanoparticles -
whether or not historic merchandise or newly launched -- work mainly the identical method:
They launch silver ions to be able to inactivate probably dangerous microbes.
As emphasised by the SNWGs Dr. Rosalind Volpe in a current letter to the EPAs Scientific Advisory Panel:

Antimicrobial performance is achieved by
way of launch of silver ions (Ag+) - a mechanism fully equivalent to all
EPA-registered silver merchandise together with
silver salts, silver glasses and silver zeolites.
The performance of nanosilver will not be distinctive.

Briefly, nanosilver doesn't meet the second main standards of a nanomaterial in want of further research and regulation. It isn't characteristically distinctive
in its operate. Silver nanoparticles work the identical method in the present
day as they did one hundred years in the past. And as soon as once more, not like many different EPA registered
merchandise, their nicely-identified documented perform has not
prompted any vital environmental repercussions in all
of those years.

Clearly, the ridiculously wild claims of the radical environmentalist
teams who've been working to power the EPA to re-categorize
nanosilver as a probably harmful environmental toxin over the
previous two years are utterly bogus.

Outdated Techniques that Didnt Work the primary Time Round

By claiming merchandise containing nanosilver are new and unique the
radical environmentalists behind the push to have the
EPA regulate (learn: ban) nanosilver merchandise are trying to
bypass the stumbling block the FDA initially got here up in opposition to throughout their decade-lengthy
makes an attempt to ban colloidal silver merchandise within the 1990s.

You see, the FDA was stopped chilly by two information: First,
the FDA couldn't deny the truth that colloidal silver merchandise
had been extensively commercially obtainable because the substance was first produced within the late 1800s.
There was nothing new or authentic about them. And secondly, the FDA couldn't deny the
truth that the general historic security document of colloidal silver over that 12 decade interval had been way more admirable than, say, most federally regulated prescription medicine.

Confronted with these exhausting details, the FDA lastly relented in 1999 and allowed colloidal
silver to remain available on the market, albeit
with just a few restrictions on its labeling and promoting.

We are able to solely hope the EPA will train the identical widespread sense the FDA was
compelled to train in 1999, and never add any extra regulatory burden on nanosilver-based mostly merchandise.
Appearing in any other case could be flying within the face
of the identified info: Nanosilver has a protracted historical past of secure, environmentally pleasant industrial utilization, and its
characteristic attributes are the identical right now as they
had been over one hundred years in the past.

The radical environmentalists are merely crying wolf, when there
isn't a wolf in sight. In line with some revealed sources, their complete marketing campaign isagenda
pushed, and thats why there shouldn't be the slightest semblance of
rationality or stability to it.

Get the Information

You'll be able to view a PDF copy of the Silver Nanotechnology Working Groups glorious presentation in protection of nanosilver merchandise to
the EPA Nanosilver Scientific Advisory Panelhere.

[img]https://cdn3.volusion.com/pahfr.ubfkh/v/vspfiles/photos/EKIT-1.gif?1450434004[/img]Andhere you may view a replica of the very informative observe-up letter from Dr.
Rosalind Volpe of the Silver Nanotechnology Working Group
to the EPA Appearing Director of the Workplace of Pesticide Applications Dr.
Stephen Bradbury.

Will These Irrefutable Info Cease the Radical Environmentalists?

Dont count on these easy, irrefutable information to cease the radical environmentalists from
actively pursuing their drive to have the EPA re-categorize nanosilver as
a toxic environmental pesticide.

In spite of everything, theyve beenfactually challenged on this
concern from the beginning.

Even now, the radical environmentalists are capitalizing on the discharge of a brand
new research from fellow environmentalists at Purdue College who've decided that - gasp!
- in the event you overdose flathead minnows on excessive concentrations of
commercially produced
powdered silver nanoparticles in an synthetic take a look at tube laboratory atmosphere, they'll present indicators of toxicity.
(Seethis publish for extra info.)

The lengths these environmentalists will go to with the intention to have
nanosilver regulated into oblivion as an environmental toxin are apparently boundless - together with conducting agenda-pushed research that throw all ideas of
trustworthy science and scholarship out the window.

[img]https://cdn3.volusion.com/pahfr.ubfkh/v/vspfiles/photos/SS_CEDAR-2.gif?1345392831[/img]Thats what makes
the radical environmentalists so harmful. They dont care how they obtain their objectives.

The ends apparently justify the means.